<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Carl Chapman &#187; censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carl-chapman.com/tag/censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carl-chapman.com</link>
	<description>Technology Consultants - Trainers - Technical Writers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:45:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Aust Govt to Continue with Net Filtering Law</title>
		<link>http://www.carl-chapman.com/general/aust-govt-to-continue-with-net-filtering-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carl-chapman.com/general/aust-govt-to-continue-with-net-filtering-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carl-chapman.com/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TweetShareThe Australian government has announced it will press on with its controversial plan to implement mandatory ISP-level internet filtering, after declaring the pilot trial a success. Obviously there’s a lot of  outrage at the government’s decision to plough ahead with its plans. Some limits, like child pornography are obvious, but moving to a mandatory ISP [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='dd_post_share dd_post_share_right'><div class='dd_buttons'><div class='dd_button_v'><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://www.carl-chapman.com/general/aust-govt-to-continue-with-net-filtering-law/" data-count="vertical" data-text="Aust Govt to Continue with Net Filtering Law " data-via="carlchapmantech" >Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div class='dd_button_v'><a name='fb_share' type='button_count' share_url='http://www.carl-chapman.com/general/aust-govt-to-continue-with-net-filtering-law/' href='http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php'>Share</a><script src='http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/connect.php/js/FB.Share' type='text/javascript'></script></div></div></div><p>The Australian government has announced it will press on with its controversial plan to implement mandatory ISP-level internet filtering, after declaring the pilot trial a success.</p>
<p>Obviously there’s a lot of  outrage at the government’s decision to plough ahead with its plans.</p>
<p>Some limits, like child pornography are obvious, but moving to a mandatory ISP filtering regime which includes politically controversial sites like pro-euthanasia sites, the Government will be stifling debate about these topics by restricting access to the sides of the argument they disagree with.</p>
<p>Back in May when the ACMA blacklist leaked to Wikileaks, it was made clear that only 32% of blocked sites were related to child porn. The other 68% included legitimate sites, YouTube videos and political sites.</p>
<p>Related articles:-</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.telecomasia.net/content/aust-govt-press-net-filtering-law">Aust govt to press on with net filtering law</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.totaltele.com/view.aspx?ID=451577">Australia pushes ahead with controversial Internet filter</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/12/some-obligatory-reading-on-the-internet-filter-issue/">Some Obligatory Reading On The Internet Filter Issue</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/24138351/Untangling-the-Net-The-Scope-of-Content-Caught-by-Mandatory-Internet-Filtering">Untangling the Net &#8211; The Scope of Content Caught by Mandatory Internet Filtering</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/12/how-to-protest-against-internet-censorship-laws/">How To Protest Against Internet Censorship Laws</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/12/telstra-optus-and-primus-all-announce-support-for-conroys-filter/">Telstra, Optus And Primus All Announce Support For Conroy’s Filter</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.itwire.com/content/view/30132/1239/">Internet filtering – did the Government just blink?</a></li>
</ul>
<div class='dd_post_share'><div class='dd_buttons'><div class='dd_button_v'><iframe src='http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://www.carl-chapman.com/general/aust-govt-to-continue-with-net-filtering-law/&amp;action=recommend&amp;layout=button_count' width='140px' scrolling='no' frameborder='0' style='border:none; overflow:hidden; height:25px;' allowTransparency='true'></iframe></div></div></div><div style='clear:both'></div><!-- Social Buttons Shared Counts Generated by Digg Digg plugin v4.2.2.2, 
    Author : Yong Mook Kim
    Website : http://www.mkyong.com/blog/digg-digg-wordpress-plugin/ -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carl-chapman.com/general/aust-govt-to-continue-with-net-filtering-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
